Results of the initial Firefox Blogger Comments test

27 December 2005 by sage

Pointing links at popular websites to attract Blogger Web Comments extension users brought moderate returns. Actually, just one link. For some reason, the only link where my post showed up through the new Firefox extension was the (personalized) Google homepage. I linked to a ton of other sites in that post, some of which I also mentioned by name, but only the first went into effect. Google seems to have put in safeguards to prevent just the kind of abuse I was attempting.

My post was the most recent listed for the Google homepage for about 8 hours (in the middle of the US night) and produced about 40 unique hits. Not overwhelming, but not insignificant. (I think I got about 25 cents in ad revenue, so it’s definitely something that could be exploited for evil). If all the links had worked, it would have been many times that. I may try a more controlled test, with short separate posts linking to popular (but probably not too blogged about) pages. Of course, the results were high partly because lots of people were testing out a new product and saw a blurb mentioning that very product, so the game would get old fast if spammers tried to take advantage of it.

However, other sites are reporting that just such abuse is occurring already, with a wide variety of spam. Fortunately, the most interesting and unknown a site, the more likely you are to check out the comments and the less likely it is to be spam-linked. But it still dilutes the value of the extension.

Possibly related posts:

  1. Testing the Firefox Google Blogger comments extension
  2. search results
  3. PageRank at last!

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

leave a comment

recent comments

  • Jana: It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I desire...
  • Nihiltres: I’ve experienced an interesting counterexample. I was given a pirate copy of “Minecraft” by my younger...
  • sage: I’m not trying to justify copyright infringement, which certainly can harm creators in many cases. But it’s a lot more...
  • Jason Waggoner: Actually, they are both theft, strictly speaking. In the first scenario, you are technically robbing the copywrite owners...
  • Darryl: There’s no mention of what might be the one best feature of Vignette, that you can set it to save the original unprocessed...

Popular Posts

archives

categories

ragesoss dents

  • But when many anecdotes complement each other, and editors pull that out, you get something cool that no current review database can match. - January 28th, 2012 at 8:46 PM
  • As I imagine it, wiki-like curation would be an important element. Amazon reviews are useful not just for ave. stars, but anecdotes. - January 28th, 2012 at 8:42 PM
  • RT@evan Someday knowing the ins and outs of copyright will be like knowing the intricate rules of internal passports in Communist East ... - January 28th, 2012 at 8:10 PM
  • Federation makes a lot of sense... pre-existing communities centered on X (e.g., Android devices) just set up an instance and federate in. - January 28th, 2012 at 8:06 PM
  • Cool! My development skills are minimal, but I'm trying to pick up Django by building a rudimentary review site. - January 28th, 2012 at 8:04 PM
  • Why we need a free culture, community-run review site, independent of any merchant: http://ur1.ca/7x7cn Anybody want to start one with me? - January 28th, 2012 at 12:39 PM

follow me on Identi.ca
www.flickr.com
ragesoss' items go to Sage's photostream

free culture

history of science, etc.

miscellanea

ragesoss feeds