Free at last (sort of)

29 May 2006 by sage

What’s Update: Courses over, Orals Fields shaping up, HSS paper accepted, WikiProject History of Science going great

My second year of coursework is over, so technically I’m done course-taking (except for the paper on science fiction for Agnew, for which I took a temporary incomplete until June). Next year I’ll be TA-ing, and probably sitting in on a least 1 additional course each semester. In the meantime, I’m studying for orals and working part-time in Manuscripts and Archives (this time working on the digitization of the finding aids, which means I get to become much more familiar what’s available here).

Because we still don’t for-sure have an early-modernist on the faculty and I can’t do both “Early-Modern Science” and “History of the Physical Sciences” with Ole, my fields are still up in the air. However, I may have found someone to supervise a field in “Science Fiction and Science Writing.” If that works out, I’ll split the cream of the early-modern crop into the Physical and Biological fields, and my four fields (~50 books each, though the Sci-Fi & Science Writing field might need to be much larger if it consists siginficantly of primary sources) will be:

  • History of Biological Sciences
  • History of Physical Sciences
  • Science Fiction and Science Writing
  • 20th Century American History

My presentation abstract for HSS was accepted; at the Vancouver meeting in November I will be giving a talk, tentatively titled “Natural Philosophy Images: Pedagogy and Popular Science in America.” How trendy is that? Visual culture, pedagogy, and popular science, all in one. It will be based on a paper I wrote in the Fall on the use of images in 19th- and early 20th-century introductory (high school/academy) natural philosophy and physics textbooks and popular science magazines. As I develop it more this summer, I’m probably going to focus on textbooks, and and try to connect the use of images to the changing role of science in American society as well as the changes within academic culture (professionalization, the rise of university research, and the related changes in teaching methods). I may dip into the archives of some of the Yale textbook authors.

WikiProject History of Science continues to grow; now there are 47 nominal participants, and a new subproject for History of Biology. Among the recent additions is Steve McCluskey, a well-known expert on archaeoastronomy. Beginning in June, there will now be a History of Science Collaboration of the Month; it looks like the first one will be Women in science. I’m very excited about this, as there are a bazillion women in science list-servs, and I plan on spamming every one (as well as my former classmates from “Science, Feminism and Modernity”). In anticpation, I got the two volumes of Margaret Rossiter’s Women Scientists in America. And best of all, the History of Science Portal (which I maintain) has been promoted to “featured” status, one of only 14 so distinguished.

In other Wikipedia news, I turned my term paper for Peter Westwick into Military funding of science, I’ve done a bit of recent work on the always enjoyable Science Wars, my re-write of Johannes Kepler is about halfway done and continues to creep along, and I have plans to use the material from Michael Kammen’s “American Nationalism and American Culture” to greatly improve Nationalism in the United States (a few of my classmates have given me permission to GFDL their book reports and short papers).

Bonus links:

Possibly related posts:

  1. I passed my orals!
  2. What sort of libertarian supports "don’t ask, don’t tell"?
  3. Readings, Research, Lamarck stuff
  4. History of science manifesto
  5. HSS meeting in Vancouver, open journals, Wikipedia evangelism

Posted in HSS, Wikipedia, grad school | No Comments »

leave a comment

recent comments

  • sage: Peter, I’m not interested in having this argument. It was interesting to me 4 years ago when I started, but all the points...
  • Peter Damian (banned editor): >>Wikipedia’s virtues far outweigh its faults, in my view But please give arguments. The page you...
  • sage: There is some validity to each of these points, of course, but you’re not raising any issues Wikipedians haven’t...
  • Peter Damian (banned editor): You haven’t answered his objection. Everything I have read by Cade seems like whole truth to me. I...
  • Peter Damian (banned editor): The main criticisms are 1. That a list of facts is not the same as a fact. 2. That by some magic having...

Popular Posts

archives

categories

ragesoss dents

  • RT@feministhulk: HULK THINK DONNA HARAWAY IS THE BEE'S KNEES. CHALLENGE HULK TO CONSIDER TECHNO-POLITICS OF HIS BIG GREEN BODY. - July 26th, 2010 at 4:13 PM
  • RT@phoebe R.I.P. Daniel Schorr. I listened to your NPR broadcasts my entire life, and you made the news humane. http://n.pr/byFI8D - July 24th, 2010 at 2:53 PM
  • I just discovered http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/ Outstanding! - July 22nd, 2010 at 11:08 AM
  • Interesting read: http://ur1.ca/0rw4w The article argues that it's human nature to double down on wrong "facts" you know when challenged. - July 20th, 2010 at 4:15 PM
  • The spam comments on my blog are really affirming and complimentary today. You're welcome, spambots! I'm glad I could brighten your day! - July 19th, 2010 at 3:10 PM
  • For all the doubters: yes, Ceiling Cat is real. http://ur1.ca/0ph5t - July 17th, 2010 at 2:15 PM

follow me on Identi.ca
www.flickr.com
ragesoss' items go to Sage's photostream

free culture

history of science, etc.

miscellanea

ragesoss feeds