<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the ways in which</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ragesoss.com/blog/2008/01/29/the-ways-in-which/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ragesoss.com/blog/2008/01/29/the-ways-in-which/</link>
	<description>assorted blogging by Sage Ross</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:26:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: envirohist</title>
		<link>http://ragesoss.com/blog/2008/01/29/the-ways-in-which/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>envirohist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ragesoss.com/blog/?p=103#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Ever since you wrote about &quot;ways in which&quot; it&#039;s been getting on my nerves and I have purged it from my own writing.  My reason for hating it is grammatical.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Example Sentence 1 : This paper explores the ways in which hermit crabs compete for available shells.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Example Sentence 2: The shells in which the hermit crabs were living were two inches in diameter.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My understanding is that the &quot;in&quot; in Sentence 1 is unnecessary, because it is not attached to the verb, &quot;compete,&quot; the way the &quot;in&quot; in Sentence 2 is attached to the verb &quot;living.&quot;  A better rewrite of Sentence 1 would be simply to say: &quot;This paper explores how hermit crabs compete for available shells.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since you wrote about &#8220;ways in which&#8221; it&#8217;s been getting on my nerves and I have purged it from my own writing.  My reason for hating it is grammatical.</p>
<p>Example Sentence 1 : This paper explores the ways in which hermit crabs compete for available shells.  </p>
<p>Example Sentence 2: The shells in which the hermit crabs were living were two inches in diameter.</p>
<p>My understanding is that the &#8220;in&#8221; in Sentence 1 is unnecessary, because it is not attached to the verb, &#8220;compete,&#8221; the way the &#8220;in&#8221; in Sentence 2 is attached to the verb &#8220;living.&#8221;  A better rewrite of Sentence 1 would be simply to say: &#8220;This paper explores how hermit crabs compete for available shells.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

