<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If all content is just data, what does that mean for quality television?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ragesoss.com/blog/2009/08/19/if-all-content-is-just-data-what-does-that-mean-for-quality-television/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ragesoss.com/blog/2009/08/19/if-all-content-is-just-data-what-does-that-mean-for-quality-television/</link>
	<description>assorted blogging by Sage Ross</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:26:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ</title>
		<link>http://ragesoss.com/blog/2009/08/19/if-all-content-is-just-data-what-does-that-mean-for-quality-television/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ragesoss.com/blog/?p=146#comment-173</guid>
		<description>The main thing I took away from the article you mentioned is that it is all inevitable anyway.  For television, this would likely be purchasing single shows.  The economics of what deciding what shows would get a chance to go into production would be interesting, but I bet Firefly would still be on the air.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main thing I took away from the article you mentioned is that it is all inevitable anyway.  For television, this would likely be purchasing single shows.  The economics of what deciding what shows would get a chance to go into production would be interesting, but I bet Firefly would still be on the air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

