<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ragesoss &#187; movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ragesoss.com/blog/category/movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ragesoss.com/blog</link>
	<description>assorted blogging by Sage Ross</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:08:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<cloud domain='ragesoss.com' port='80' path='/blog/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Neal Stephenson on 300</title>
		<link>http://ragesoss.com/blog/2007/03/18/neal-stephenson-on-300/</link>
		<comments>http://ragesoss.com/blog/2007/03/18/neal-stephenson-on-300/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neal Stephenson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ragesoss.com/blog/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(The) Neal Stephenson has a great op-ed about 300 in the New York Times. He has a lot to say about the changing currents of culture and the recent history of science fiction, but his defense of 300 against the poor critical reception (although David Edelstein hasn&#8217;t yet produced a review, which is generally the [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(The) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neal_Stephenson">Neal Stephenson</a> has a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/18/opinion/18stephenson.html">great op-ed about <span style="font-style: italic;">300</span></a> in the <span style="font-style: italic;">New York Times</span>.  He has a lot to say about the changing currents of culture and the recent history of science fiction, but his defense of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/300_%28film%29"><span style="font-style: italic;">300</span></a> against the poor critical reception (although <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Edelstein">David Edelstein</a> hasn&#8217;t yet produced a review, which is generally the only one I even think of taking seriously) is superb, and could well be about any number of the good things about modern popular culture: &#8220;These [geeks] don’t need irony or campiness self-consciously pointed out to them, any more than they need a laugh track to enjoy “The Simpsons.”&#8221;</p>
<p>On that note, I&#8217;m off to see <span style="font-style: italic;">300</span>.  Hopefully, it won&#8217;t turn me into a xenophobic Persian-hater.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ragesoss.com/blog/2007/03/18/neal-stephenson-on-300/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

