Filed under: Zotero

Josh Greenberg, Zotero, and Scholarship 2.0 (!! Beta! Zap! Pow!)

April 17th, 2007

Today, my department’s Holmes Workshop speaker was Josh Greenberg (aka, Epistemographer): an historian/STSer/hacker, formerly of the Center for History and New Media, now the “Director of Digital Strategy and Scholarship” (how rad a title is that?) at the New York Public Library.

I’ve been following the CHnM for a while now, and I had read about their flagship project Zotero, but I never realized what a revolutionary vision they have for this thing. Zotero is a Firefox plugin that does citations. It was initially conceived as an open source replacement EndNote (the only selling point for which, from what I hear, is that it’s not quite as bad as Word for footnotes).

In his introduction, Josh had an insightful comparison of “Finding vs. Searching”, basically the difference between an organized hierarchy of information (e.g., early Yahoo!, library stacks, and bibliographies), in which serendipitously finding things is the great benefit, and using the ubiquitous search boxes of the modern internet (e.g., Google, online library catalogs), with which you are searching for finite results in an undifferentiated database where anything outside the search parameters is simply invisible. (By random coincidence, he had randomly included this picture by me as an icon of the finding mode; hooray for unattributed syndication!).

Part of the goal of Zotero is to harness the best of both the searching and finding modes by adding a Web 2.0 social element to the citation program. This summer, the developers will be launching a Zotero server that will archive a user’s citation database so that it can be accessed from anywhere and retained in case of hardware failure. The upshot is that, unless the user opts out, the citation database will be used (sans private information, if desired) to create a sort of del.icio.us for scholarly material. Zotero will be useful enough to be used on its own, with the aggregate social aspect as icing that brings the potential for scholarly collaboration and recommendation to a new level. You can find other bibliographies similar to yours to see what like-minded scholars are reading that you aren’t, and you might be able to find other scholars you didn’t know about with similar research interests. In future versions, you’ll be able to share your marginalia, your original sources (interviews, photographs from archives, etc.), etc.

What makes Zotero cool today is the ability to automatically pull citation data from a large and ever-growing list of online sources. So you do a search on your local library catalog, and with one click you import the metadata for that source to your library. Then, when you want to cite that source, you have a wide range of output options (MLA, Chicago Style, EndNote, etc.). What sold me is that it even does export in Wikipedia citation template syntax. I never use the cite templates, because it’s usually easier to just type in the references how I want them. But with Zotero, I’m going to start using them. For the Wikipedians reading this, I recommend trying it out (make sure you get Beta 4, from the Zotero website; the one straight from Firefox is out of date and doesn’t have the Wikipedia support). It’s under heavy development and improving rapidly, but it’s already a very helpful thing.

Posted in Josh Greenberg, Wikipedia, Zotero, digital history, garden-variety history, historians | 2 Comments »

recent comments

  • sage: Peter, I’m not interested in having this argument. It was interesting to me 4 years ago when I started, but all the points...
  • Peter Damian (banned editor): >>Wikipedia’s virtues far outweigh its faults, in my view But please give arguments. The page you...
  • sage: There is some validity to each of these points, of course, but you’re not raising any issues Wikipedians haven’t...
  • Peter Damian (banned editor): You haven’t answered his objection. Everything I have read by Cade seems like whole truth to me. I...
  • Peter Damian (banned editor): The main criticisms are 1. That a list of facts is not the same as a fact. 2. That by some magic having...

Popular Posts

archives

categories

ragesoss dents

  • RT@feministhulk: HULK THINK DONNA HARAWAY IS THE BEE'S KNEES. CHALLENGE HULK TO CONSIDER TECHNO-POLITICS OF HIS BIG GREEN BODY. - July 26th, 2010 at 4:13 PM
  • RT@phoebe R.I.P. Daniel Schorr. I listened to your NPR broadcasts my entire life, and you made the news humane. http://n.pr/byFI8D - July 24th, 2010 at 2:53 PM
  • I just discovered http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/ Outstanding! - July 22nd, 2010 at 11:08 AM
  • Interesting read: http://ur1.ca/0rw4w The article argues that it's human nature to double down on wrong "facts" you know when challenged. - July 20th, 2010 at 4:15 PM
  • The spam comments on my blog are really affirming and complimentary today. You're welcome, spambots! I'm glad I could brighten your day! - July 19th, 2010 at 3:10 PM
  • For all the doubters: yes, Ceiling Cat is real. http://ur1.ca/0ph5t - July 17th, 2010 at 2:15 PM

follow me on Identi.ca
www.flickr.com
ragesoss' items go to Sage's photostream

free culture

history of science, etc.

miscellanea

ragesoss feeds