Wikipedia traffic for content linked on the Main Page

11 March 2008 by sage

How much exposure comes with time on the main page of Wikipedia? The short answer: a featured article may get between 15 thousand and 100 thousand hits, depending on the mass appeal of the topic and the day of the week; a new article featured on Did you know? will bring anywhere from several hundred to several thousand hits, depending on the hook and time of day it’s up; a thumbnail from In the news may get tens of thousands of hits per day, on par with a Featured Picture (which is below the fold for most visitors).

Quirky, unexpected articles do much better than articles on better known topics. Examples from February:

  • Peru, which typically gets 4-7 thousand hits per day, only had 37 thousand on its day in the spotlight.
  • “Through the Looking Glass”, a Lost episode, got 100 thousand hits, compared to a normal day of about 1 thousand.
  • Golden plates, which usually gets 3-5 hundred hits, got 90 thousand.
  • Other Featured Articles at the high end of the hit spectrum: Knut the polar bear, Ronald Reagan
  • Articles at the low end: Barn Swallow, Constitution of Belarus, Irish phonology, Thoughts on the Education of Daughters

Consider some main page items from February 21:

  • The Featured Article, Bengali Language Movement: 14 thousand hits
  • A lunar eclipse thumbnail from In the news: 23 thousand hits
  • The article about that eclipse: 135 thousand hits (although possibly much of that traffic came from elsewhere; there’s no baseline to judge)
  • Other In the news articles, some blurbs up to 5 days old: ranging from 2.5 thousand to 45 thousand.
  • Did you know? articles: mostly in the 500-1000 hit range (for ca. a six hour period), while the image for the top article had twice the hits of the article itself.
  • On this day articles: thousands of hits each, some over 10 thousand
  • The Featured Picture, a dragonfly macro: 17 thousands hits

The most interesting thing about these numbers, to me, is how disproportionally heavy the aggregate traffic is for In the news than for other sectors. Much of the time the main articles for the newest news entries–represented by a single line each on the Main Page–have similar hit counts to the Featured Article–which has a whole box in better screen real estate. The anniversaries also have a strong showing, especially considering their placement on the bottom right of the screen.

The next time the Main Page gets redesigned, Wikipedians might want to do some more detailed research on which elements are most popular and factor the results into the design plans.

Possibly related posts:

  1. My day on the Wikipedia front page
  2. If all content is just data, what does that mean for quality television?
  3. History of science viewing stats on Wikipedia
  4. The Future of Wikipedia (my take), part 1
  5. Wikipedia as a source

Posted in Wikipedia | 2 Comments »

2 Responses to “Wikipedia traffic for content linked on the Main Page”

  1. Ben says:

    Where do you get the stats on the wikipedia traffic by page?

  2. Sage says:

    They come from this site: http://stats.grok.se/

leave a comment

recent comments

  • Nihiltres: I’ve experienced an interesting counterexample. I was given a pirate copy of “Minecraft” by my younger...
  • sage: I’m not trying to justify copyright infringement, which certainly can harm creators in many cases. But it’s a lot more...
  • Jason Waggoner: Actually, they are both theft, strictly speaking. In the first scenario, you are technically robbing the copywrite owners...
  • Darryl: There’s no mention of what might be the one best feature of Vignette, that you can set it to save the original unprocessed...
  • Rami: The problem for me is that the app takes on its own look and feel rather than being similar to the stock android app with added...

Popular Posts

archives

categories

ragesoss dents

  • But when many anecdotes complement each other, and editors pull that out, you get something cool that no current review database can match. - January 28th, 2012 at 8:46 PM
  • As I imagine it, wiki-like curation would be an important element. Amazon reviews are useful not just for ave. stars, but anecdotes. - January 28th, 2012 at 8:42 PM
  • RT@evan Someday knowing the ins and outs of copyright will be like knowing the intricate rules of internal passports in Communist East ... - January 28th, 2012 at 8:10 PM
  • Federation makes a lot of sense... pre-existing communities centered on X (e.g., Android devices) just set up an instance and federate in. - January 28th, 2012 at 8:06 PM
  • Cool! My development skills are minimal, but I'm trying to pick up Django by building a rudimentary review site. - January 28th, 2012 at 8:04 PM
  • Why we need a free culture, community-run review site, independent of any merchant: http://ur1.ca/7x7cn Anybody want to start one with me? - January 28th, 2012 at 12:39 PM

follow me on Identi.ca
www.flickr.com
ragesoss' items go to Sage's photostream

free culture

history of science, etc.

miscellanea

ragesoss feeds