More scholars calling for Wikipedia involvement

5 May 2007 by sage

After Roy Rosenzweig’s June 2006 article on Wikipedia in The Journal of American History, “Can History be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past“, I predicted a large-scale change in the way scholars—humanists in particular—view Wikipedia. Things started slowly; Marshall Poe’s September article in The Atlantic Monthly, “The Hive” was the next major piece, and other interesting viewpoints continued to trickle in until the Middlebury College ban.

But lately, calls for involvement and reports of classroom success have been coming in rapidly. Recommended reading:

I’m working on my own piece for historians of science, and I’m trying to kick the inflammatory rhetoric up a notch. I probably need to come up with a catchy title, though. Unfortunately, garden-variety historians and English professors have already melted the obvious Dr. Strangelove snowclone. (What’s up with that? That’s history of science territory!) Maybe I could go with the other Strangelove snowclone: “We must not allow a Wikipedia gap!”

By the way, any suggests for improving the above article would be greatly appreciated; I’ll be submitting it soon.

Possibly related posts:

  1. "We Cannot Allow a Wikipedia Gap!" in Spontaneous Generations
  2. Superb Wikipedia podcast; Ideas for Wikipedia to steal
  3. Wikipedia as a source
  4. On the Internet, anyone can be a historian
  5. Presentism and the history of science on Wikipedia

Posted in academia, garden-variety history, historians, historians of science, Wikipedia | 3 Comments »

3 Responses to “More scholars calling for Wikipedia involvement”

  1. ray says:

    cool post.

    if u don’t mind, i’m borrowing your links for my paper. I have to write a final paper for my English class and I chose controversy over Wikipedia.

  2. Sage says:

    The piece I was writing is available from Spontaneous Generations:
    http://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/SpontaneousGenerations/article/view/1017

leave a comment

recent comments

  • Nihiltres: I’ve experienced an interesting counterexample. I was given a pirate copy of “Minecraft” by my younger...
  • sage: I’m not trying to justify copyright infringement, which certainly can harm creators in many cases. But it’s a lot more...
  • Jason Waggoner: Actually, they are both theft, strictly speaking. In the first scenario, you are technically robbing the copywrite owners...
  • Darryl: There’s no mention of what might be the one best feature of Vignette, that you can set it to save the original unprocessed...
  • Rami: The problem for me is that the app takes on its own look and feel rather than being similar to the stock android app with added...

Popular Posts

archives

categories

ragesoss dents

  • But when many anecdotes complement each other, and editors pull that out, you get something cool that no current review database can match. - January 28th, 2012 at 8:46 PM
  • As I imagine it, wiki-like curation would be an important element. Amazon reviews are useful not just for ave. stars, but anecdotes. - January 28th, 2012 at 8:42 PM
  • RT@evan Someday knowing the ins and outs of copyright will be like knowing the intricate rules of internal passports in Communist East ... - January 28th, 2012 at 8:10 PM
  • Federation makes a lot of sense... pre-existing communities centered on X (e.g., Android devices) just set up an instance and federate in. - January 28th, 2012 at 8:06 PM
  • Cool! My development skills are minimal, but I'm trying to pick up Django by building a rudimentary review site. - January 28th, 2012 at 8:04 PM
  • Why we need a free culture, community-run review site, independent of any merchant: http://ur1.ca/7x7cn Anybody want to start one with me? - January 28th, 2012 at 12:39 PM

follow me on Identi.ca
www.flickr.com
ragesoss' items go to Sage's photostream

free culture

history of science, etc.

miscellanea

ragesoss feeds