BibliOdyssey on Commons

4 October 2007 by sage

Peacay of the amazing BibliOdyssey blog has joined Wikimedia Commons (after a bit of encouragement from me). BibliOdyssey, which focuses on scans of printed art, is quite an amazing blog; it serves as a continual reminder of just how big the web is, and how little of it the typical person ever sees. Hundreds of libraries and archives are digitizing thousands of fantastic images, and Peacay trawls through the wide web and finds the best of them.

Unfortunately (as I understand it), although most of the original versions of what Peacay showcases are public domain, the copyright status of most of the images are in that murky space between free and unfree. The United States is fortunate (or maybe unfortunate if you are a world class library) to have Bridgeman v. Corel (for now, at least), but in most countries, a “sweat of the brow” doctrine means that whoever scans the pages of a rare book can claim copyright on the scans, even if the original is public domain. Even in the United States, it is typical for libraries to assert copyright control over scans of public domain material they own (e.g., as the University of Oklahoma does on its wonderful, growing collection of history of science images). Of course, no one on the web pays much attention to such claims (whether they have legal force or not), but for many of the images on Commons, a re-user trying to publish nominally free images in the traditional publishing world will still have to go through the usual trials and tribulations to secure permissions.

Anyhow, check out the great image sets Peacay has uploaded so far, and hopefully we’ll see more in the future.

Possibly related posts:

  1. Creative Commons on whitehouse.gov
  2. How are your Wikimedia Commons photos being used elsewhere?
  3. Database right and the NPG threat
  4. "Charging the Void"
  5. Libraries and copyfraud

Posted in Wikimedia, Wikipedia, art, art history, books, copyright | No Comments »

leave a comment

recent comments

  • sage: Peter, I’m not interested in having this argument. It was interesting to me 4 years ago when I started, but all the points...
  • Peter Damian (banned editor): >>Wikipedia’s virtues far outweigh its faults, in my view But please give arguments. The page you...
  • sage: There is some validity to each of these points, of course, but you’re not raising any issues Wikipedians haven’t...
  • Peter Damian (banned editor): You haven’t answered his objection. Everything I have read by Cade seems like whole truth to me. I...
  • Peter Damian (banned editor): The main criticisms are 1. That a list of facts is not the same as a fact. 2. That by some magic having...

Popular Posts

archives

categories

ragesoss dents

  • RT@feministhulk: HULK THINK DONNA HARAWAY IS THE BEE'S KNEES. CHALLENGE HULK TO CONSIDER TECHNO-POLITICS OF HIS BIG GREEN BODY. - July 26th, 2010 at 4:13 PM
  • RT@phoebe R.I.P. Daniel Schorr. I listened to your NPR broadcasts my entire life, and you made the news humane. http://n.pr/byFI8D - July 24th, 2010 at 2:53 PM
  • I just discovered http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/ Outstanding! - July 22nd, 2010 at 11:08 AM
  • Interesting read: http://ur1.ca/0rw4w The article argues that it's human nature to double down on wrong "facts" you know when challenged. - July 20th, 2010 at 4:15 PM
  • The spam comments on my blog are really affirming and complimentary today. You're welcome, spambots! I'm glad I could brighten your day! - July 19th, 2010 at 3:10 PM
  • For all the doubters: yes, Ceiling Cat is real. http://ur1.ca/0ph5t - July 17th, 2010 at 2:15 PM

follow me on Identi.ca
www.flickr.com
ragesoss' items go to Sage's photostream

free culture

history of science, etc.

miscellanea

ragesoss feeds